Ending sentences with prepositions

Everyone has heard this; however, there is a lot of contention and misconception surrounding this grammar “rule”. First of all, I believe it should not be considered a grammar rule, but rather a rule of rhetoric; that is, ending sentences with prepositions is usually less effective or powerful, rather than incorrect. Generally speaking, with formal, elevated writing, it is preferable to avoid ending a sentence with a preposition, and sentences that might seem natural in spoken English are better off rewritten to avoid this.

Here’s the irreverent Perry Bible Fellowship’s take:

(check out more hilarious comics at http://www.pbfcomics.com)

Of course, the sentence here would sound more formal were it “You guys have skills with which even I am impressed.”

Some stuffy grammarians argue that you must avoid ending sentences with prepositions in order to be correct grammatically; I would argue you don’t.

This “rule” is a carry over from the rules of Latin, a language in which it is always incorrect to end a sentence with a preposition. It would be nice, admittedly, to be able to just transfer every grammar rule from Latin over to English. Unfortunately, that doesn’t always work. For example, In Latin, a subject-object-verb word order (much like, say, Japanese) is normally correct. I don’t hear of too many people prescribing that as correct English:

English, as we all know (at least intuitively) is a subject-verb-object language.

In the above sentence, the subject is “I“, the verb is “will have” and the object is “caramel macchiato no-whip extra soy“.

Basically, a lot of old-timey linguists thought that Latin was a “grammatically perfect” language and that English was, well, less so. Therefore, they believed that adhering to as many grammatical rules of Latin as possible would benefit English. However, English is derived from a wide variety of older languages, and hard and fast grammar rules such as “never end a sentence in a preposition” aren’t always going to work (or, work naturally) in English like they do in Latin.

Even Winston Churchill hated this rule, and he’s not someone I would have wanted to argue with. Yeah, I just ended that sentence with a preposition. What now, gangsta?

When one of his editors dared to rearrange one of his sentences so that it did not end in a preposition, he wrote back to him:

“This is the sort of bloody nonsense up with which I will not put”

A classic line, however, slightly misguided. The “preposition rule,” even if you do subscribe to it (and I don’t believe you should), does not apply to phrasal verbs. In the above sentence, the verb is not put; the verb is the phrasal verb put up with. When using phrasal verbs, it is NOT correct to rearrange the wording to avoid ending the sentence with a preposition (which is why Churchill’s example reads so clumsily). The only caveat here is that phrasal verbs are often used as more colloquial alternatives to other verbs (“I put out the fire” rather than “I extinguished the fire,” or “she turned off the lights” rather than “she deactivated the lights,” etc), and so in “elevated, formal writing,” you should likely avoid phrasal verbs altogether rather than even worry about this.

 

In summation: Don’t bother with the “never end a sentence with a preposition” rule unless you are writing for someone who might believe this to be a “sacred cow” of grammar. In that case, feel free to conform for their sake, not for the sake of proper grammar.

Most importantly:

 

 

        

Advertisements

About Boggleton Drive

I teach things to people and sometimes draw comics.
This entry was posted in Grammar Lessons! and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Ending sentences with prepositions

  1. artjen1971 says:

    Thank you!!! I feel very affected when I try to write by the rule. It feels too formal in most cases.

  2. Miss Edee says:

    I really like your take on this: rhetoric vs. grammar. If I’m not mistaken, the idea that Latin is perfect is where we get the “never split an infinitive” rule. I speak Spanish, not Latin, but it’s the same for both languages and easier for me to explain with Spanish. The infinitive “comer” means “to eat” in English. “Comer” is one word, “to eat” is two (duh). It’s impossible to split the infinitive in Spanish. So I like to freaking split infinitives whenever I want to.

  3. neutral flamingos says:

    This was really helpful as well as really funny. I just discovered your blog today and I’m really liking what I see so far.

  4. Smart Guy says:

    Hilarious this blog be I am to finding it.

    Am I doing this right?

  5. Haha this is my kind of blog – clever work 🙂

  6. setinmotion says:

    Hahaha, I appreciate the Chomsky slur. So true. And everyone always forgets about Herman…

  7. Thanks Prof. I am learning here and at the same time having fun 🙂
    English is my second language. So I would advice you to correct any grammar or sentence errors that I make when I leave you a comment or a reply, ok? Thanks!

  8. Reminds me of this joke. Not that funny without the accompanying strip, but it was from printed comic book (gasp, totally unheard of nowadays) which I lost a long time ago.

    Engineering major: Where is the math building at?
    Literature major: You don’t end sentences with prepositions.
    Engineer major: Okay, so where is the math building at, you cow?

Say stuff!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s